| Title |
Human Chorionic Villous Mesenchymal Stem Cells Modify the Functions of Human Dendritic Cells, and Induce an Anti-Inflammatory Phenotype in CD1+ Dendritic Cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12015-014-9562-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
F. M. Abomaray, M. A. Al Jumah, B. Kalionis, A. S. AlAskar, S. Al Harthy, D. Jawdat, A. Al Khaldi, A. Alkushi, B. A. Knawy, M. H. Abumaree |
| Abstract |
Mesenchymal stem cells derived from the chorionic villi of human term placenta (pMSCs) have drawn considerable interest because of their multipotent differentiation potential and their immunomodulatory capacity. These properties are the foundation for their clinical application in the fields of stem cell transplantation and regenerative medicine. Previously, we showed that pMSCs induce an anti-inflammatory phenotype in human macrophages. In this study, we determined whether pMSCs modify the differentiation and maturation of human monocytes into dendritic cells (DCs). The consequences on dendritic function and on T cell proliferation were also investigated. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 43 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 13 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 15 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2016.
All research outputs
#15,739,010
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#595
of 1,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,212
of 267,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.