↓ Skip to main content

Procalcitonin Algorithm in Critically Ill Adults with Undifferentiated Infection or Suspected Sepsis. A Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
23 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
262 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Procalcitonin Algorithm in Critically Ill Adults with Undifferentiated Infection or Suspected Sepsis. A Randomized Controlled Trial
Published in
American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine, November 2014
DOI 10.1164/rccm.201408-1483oc
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yahya Shehabi, Martin Sterba, Peter Maxwell Garrett, Kanaka Sundaram Rachakonda, Dianne Stephens, Peter Harrigan, Alison Walker, Michael J. Bailey, Bronwyn Johnson, David Millis, Geoff Ding, Sandra Peake, Helen Wong, Jane Thomas, Kate Smith, Loretta Forbes, Miranda Hardie, Sharon Micallef, John F. Fraser

Abstract

Rationale: The role of Procalcitonin (PCT), a widely used sepsis biomarker, in critically ill patients with sepsis is undetermined. Objectives: To investigate the effect of a low PCT cut-off on antibiotic prescription and to describe the relationships between PCT plasma concentration and sepsis severity and mortality. Methods: Multicenter (11 Australian ICUs) prospective, single blind, randomized controlled trial involving 400 patients with suspected bacterial infection/sepsis and expected to receive antibiotics and stay in ICU longer than 24 hours. The primary outcome was the cumulative number of antibiotics treatment days at day 28. Measurements and main results: PCT was measured daily while in ICU. A PCT algorithm including 0.1ng/ml cut-off, determined antibiotic cessation. Published Guidelines and Antimicrobial Stewardship were utilized in all patients. Primary analysis included 196 (PCT) versus 198 standard care (STDC) patients. 93 patients in each group had septic shock. The overall median (inter-quartile range) number of antibiotic treatment days were 9[6-21] vs 11[6-22], P=0.58, in patients with positive pulmonary culture 11[7-27] vs 15[8-27], P=0.33 and in patients with septic shock 9[6-22] vs 11[6-24], P=0.64 with an overall 90-day all-cause mortality of 35(18%) vs. 31(16%), P=0.54 in the PCT vs STDC respectively. Using logistic regression, adjusted for age, ventilation status and positive culture, the decline rate in log(PCT) over first 72 hours independently predicted hospital and 90-day mortality [Odds ratio (95% confidence intervals) 2.76(1.10-6.96), P=0.03, 3.20(1.30-7.89), P=0.01], respectively. Conclusion: In critically ill adults with undifferentiated infections, a PCT algorithm including 0.1ng/ml cut-off did not achieve 25% the reduction in duration of antibiotic treatment. Clinical trial registration information available at http://www.anzctr.org.au, ID ACTRN12610000809033.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 256 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 41 16%
Researcher 28 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 8%
Student > Master 21 8%
Other 66 25%
Unknown 61 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 140 53%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Engineering 6 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 22 8%
Unknown 68 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,186,867
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
#940
of 12,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,024
of 268,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
#7
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.