You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Both Lewis and Secretor Status Mediate Susceptibility to Rotavirus Infections in a Rotavirus Genotype–Dependent Manner
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Infectious Diseases, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1093/cid/ciu633 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Johan Nordgren, Sumit Sharma, Filemon Bucardo, Waqas Nasir, Gökçe Günaydın, Djeneba Ouermi, Leon W. Nitiema, Sylvia Becker-Dreps, Jacques Simpore, Lennart Hammarström, Göran Larson, Lennart Svensson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 15% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 77% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 92% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 131 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 14% |
| Researcher | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 18% |
| Unknown | 36 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 36 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2020.
All research outputs
#753,260
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#1,404
of 16,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,088
of 243,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#13
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.