↓ Skip to main content

Genomic analyses reveal low mitochondrial and high nuclear diversity in the cyclosporin-producing fungus Tolypocladium inflatum

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Genomic analyses reveal low mitochondrial and high nuclear diversity in the cyclosporin-producing fungus Tolypocladium inflatum
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00253-017-8574-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yong-Jie Zhang, Xiao-Qing Yang, Shu Zhang, Richard A. Humber, Jianping Xu

Abstract

Mitochondrial DNA is generally regarded to evolve faster than nuclear DNA in animals, whereas if this is also true in fungi remains unclear. Herein, we annotate the first complete mitochondrial genome (mitogenome) of the cyclosporin-producing fungus Tolypocladium inflatum and report the genome-wide sequence variations among five isolates originating from distantly separated localities. We found that T. inflatum has among the most compact of fungal mitogenomes; its 25 kb DNA molecule encodes all standard fungal mitochondrial genes and harbors only one intron. Transcriptional analyses validated the expression of most conserved genes. We found several uncommon repetitive elements and evidence of gene transfer from the mitochondrion to the nucleus. Phylogenetic analyses confirmed the placement of T. inflatum in the fungal order Hypocreales although there was uncertainty on its family-level affiliation. Comparative genomic analyses among the five isolates identified an overall lower level of intraspecific variation in mitogenomes than in nuclear genomes; however, both the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes revealed similar isolate relationships, not correlating with geographic sources of these isolates. Our study shed new insights into the evolution of the medicinally important ascomycete T. inflatum.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 19%
Student > Master 4 19%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 5%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Unknown 8 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2017.
All research outputs
#19,611,252
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#6,478
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,681
of 329,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#77
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.