↓ Skip to main content

Plasmonic cell nanocoating: a new concept for rapid microbial screening

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Plasmonic cell nanocoating: a new concept for rapid microbial screening
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00216-017-0612-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ke Xu, Minh-Phuong N. Bui, Aiqin Fang, Abdennour Abbas

Abstract

Nanocoating of single microbial cells with gold nanostructures can confer optical, electrical, thermal, and mechanical properties to microorganisms, thus enabling new avenues for their control, study, application, and detection. Cell nanocoating is often performed using layer-by-layer (LbL) deposition. LbL is time-consuming and relies on nonspecific electrostatic interactions, which limit potential applications for microbial diagnostics. Here, we show that, by taking advantage of surface molecules densely present in the microbial outer layers, cell nanocoating with gold nanoparticles can be achieved within seconds using surface molecules, including disulfide- bond-containing (Dsbc) proteins and chitin. A simple activation of these markers and their subsequent interaction with gold nanoparticles allow specific microbial screening and quantification of bacteria and fungi within 5 and 30 min, respectively. The use of plasmonics and fluorescence as transduction methods offers a limit of detection below 35 cfu mL(-1) for E. coli bacteria and 1500 cfu mL(-1) for M. circinelloides fungi using a hand-held fluorescent reader. Graphical abstract A new concept for rapid microbial screening by targeting disulfide - bond-containing (Dsbc) proteins and chitin with reducing agents and gold nanoparticles.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 27%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 18%
Chemical Engineering 1 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Energy 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2017.
All research outputs
#22,793,536
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#7,560
of 9,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,398
of 323,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#104
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,635 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.