| Title |
External Beam Radiation Therapy for Resectable Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-017-6081-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Markus Albertsmeier, Alexandra Rauch, Falk Roeder, Sandro Hasenhütl, Sebastian Pratschke, Michaela Kirschneck, Alessandro Gronchi, Nina L. Jebsen, Philippe A. Cassier, Paul Sargos, Claus Belka, Lars H. Lindner, Jens Werner, Martin K. Angele |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 5 | 19% |
| United States | 3 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 12% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 62% |
| Scientists | 5 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 36 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,282,861
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#487
of 7,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,872
of 325,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#13
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.