You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A hierarchical model combining distance sampling and time removal to estimate detection probability during avian point counts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ornithology, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1642/auk-14-11.1 |
| Authors |
Courtney L. Amundson, J. Andrew Royle, Colleen M. Handel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Latvia | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 266 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 86 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 56 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 8% |
| Unknown | 33 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 155 | 55% |
| Environmental Science | 70 | 25% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 2 | <1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 44 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2016.
All research outputs
#4,619,624
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Ornithology
#495
of 2,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,509
of 241,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ornithology
#12
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.