↓ Skip to main content

Brain stones revisited—between a rock and a hard place

Overview of attention for article published in Insights into Imaging, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Brain stones revisited—between a rock and a hard place
Published in
Insights into Imaging, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s13244-013-0279-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Froilan G. Celzo, Caroline Venstermans, Frank De Belder, Johan Van Goethem, Luc van den Hauwe, Thijs van der Zijden, Maurits Voormolen, Tomas Menovsky, Andrew Maas, Paul M. Parizel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 10 18%
Student > Postgraduate 6 11%
Researcher 6 11%
Other 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 14 25%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 52%
Neuroscience 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 14 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,372,294
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#367
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,929
of 203,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.