↓ Skip to main content

The Impact of Financial Hardship on Single Parents: An Exploration of the Journey From Social Distress to Seeking Help

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Family and Economic Issues, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 393)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
19 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
353 Mendeley
Title
The Impact of Financial Hardship on Single Parents: An Exploration of the Journey From Social Distress to Seeking Help
Published in
Journal of Family and Economic Issues, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10834-017-9551-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca Jayne Stack, Alex Meredith

Abstract

Single parent families are at high risk of financial hardship which may impact on psychological wellbeing. This study explored the impact of financial hardship on wellbeing on 15 single parents. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed using constructivist thematic analysis. Participants described food and fuel poverty, and the need to make sacrifices to ensure that children's basic needs were met. In some cases, participants went without food and struggled to pay bills. Isolation, anxiety, depression, paranoia, and suicidal thoughts were described. However, participants reported that psychological services not able to take the needs of single parents in to account. Support for single parents must acknowledge the impact of social circumstances and give more consideration economic drivers of distress.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 353 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 353 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 54 15%
Student > Master 45 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 7%
Researcher 21 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 5%
Other 41 12%
Unknown 149 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 50 14%
Social Sciences 42 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13 4%
Other 52 15%
Unknown 156 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2024.
All research outputs
#634,536
of 25,489,496 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Family and Economic Issues
#19
of 393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,360
of 336,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Family and Economic Issues
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,489,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.