↓ Skip to main content

Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic organ-sparing resection in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a single-center experience

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic organ-sparing resection in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a single-center experience
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00464-016-5411-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Javier A. Cienfuegos, Joseba Salguero, Jorge M. Núñez-Córdoba, Miguel Ruiz-Canela, Alberto Benito, Sira Ocaña, Gabriel Zozaya, Pablo Martí-Cruchaga, Fernando Pardo, José Luis Hernández-Lizoáin, Fernando Rotellar

Abstract

Laparoscopic organ-sparing pancreatectomy (LOSP) is an ideal therapeutic option in selected cases of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). Nevertheless, given the low frequency of PNETs, there is scarce evidence regarding short and particularly long-term outcomes of LOSP in this clinical setting. All patients with PNETs who underwent surgery (under a LOSP policy) were retrospectively reviewed from a prospective database maintained at our center. Preoperative characteristics, operative data, pathological features and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Between December 2003 and December 2015, 36 patients with PNETs underwent laparoscopic resections. Ten were functional tumors, 26 non-functional and 16 were "incidental" cases. The following procedures were performed: one enucleation, eight central pancreatectomies (LCP), one resection of the uncinate process and 26 distal pancreatectomies (DP) (15 of them laparoscopic vessels-preserving). There were no conversions to open surgery, and no drains were routinely left. Mean operative time was 288 min (SD 99). Hospital stay was 6 days. Eighteen patients (50%) experienced some complication of which most were mild (Clavien-Dindo I/II). Three postoperative bleedings occurred: two grade B/one grade C; two required laparoscopic reoperation. Thirteen (36.1%) patients developed peripancreatic fluid collections: two were symptomatic and were managed with transgastric drainage (one presented post-puncture abscesification requiring surgical drainage and splenectomy). Four patients (11%)-one DP and three LCP-developed new-onset pancreatogenic diabetes mellitus (NODM) in the long term. According to the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society, 19 cases were stage I, seven IIA, two IIIA, one IIIB and seven stage IV. Over a mean follow-up of 51 months, two patients died, one due to recurrence of the tumor and another due to cirrhosis. The existing different surgical options must be individually considered according to the location and particular characteristics of every tumor. Results from this single-center study document the effectiveness of LOSP in selected cases of PNETs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 18%
Other 6 11%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 12 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 16 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2017.
All research outputs
#15,481,888
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#3,831
of 6,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,221
of 419,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#67
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,101 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.