↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic utility of combined retinal ganglion cell count estimates in Japanese glaucoma patients

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Diagnostic utility of combined retinal ganglion cell count estimates in Japanese glaucoma patients
Published in
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10384-017-0540-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mari Sakamoto, Sotaro Mori, Kaori Ueda, Azusa Akashi, Yukako Inoue, Takuji Kurimoto, Akiyasu Kanamori, Yuko Yamada, Makoto Nakamura

Abstract

To assess the combined estimate of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) count developed by Medeiros et al. as a tool for diagnosis of glaucoma in Japanese patients. Cross-sectional study. Thirty-one eyes of 19 healthy controls and 106 eyes of 70 glaucoma patients underwent standard automated perimetry (SAP) and three types of spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) imaging using the Cirrus, RTVue, and 3D-OCT instruments. RGC counts derived from SAP and SD-OCT data were estimated using the Harwerth model (SAPrgc and OCTrgc, respectively), from which the combined RGC count estimates (CRGC) were calculated using the formula developed by Medeiros et al. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses were conducted for mean deviation (MD), retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT), and CRGC. The mean OCTrgc derived from the Cirrus, RTVue, and 3D-OCT instruments were 1150, 1245, and 1316 (× 1000 cells), respectively, for the control group and 463, 519, and 516 (× 1000 cells), respectively, for the patient group. SAPrgc of the controls' group was 1526 and the patients' group, 731 (× 1000 cells), and were consistently greater than OCTrgc in both groups (a generalized estimating equation model, p < 0.001). Partial area under the curve (pAUC) of MD was 0.178, and that of RNFLT and CRGC for the three OCT instruments were 0.185, 0.18, 0.189 and 0.196, 0.196, 0.197, respectively. CRGC had larger pAUC than MD, whereas there was no or marginal difference in pAUC between CRGC and cpRNFLT, irrespective of OCT device used or glaucoma severity. CRGC proved well suited to discriminate glaucoma patients from controls. However, its clinical utility did not seem to overwhelm isolated structural measures in the tested Japanese patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Computer Science 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2017.
All research outputs
#20,450,513
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology
#351
of 493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,316
of 325,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 493 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.