↓ Skip to main content

The development of a test of reactive agility for netball: a new methodology

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
157 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
278 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The development of a test of reactive agility for netball: a new methodology
Published in
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, March 2005
DOI 10.1016/s1440-2440(05)80024-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

D Farrow, W Young, L Bruce

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to present a new methodology for the measurement of agility for netball that is considered more ecologically valid than previous agility tests. Specifically, the agility performance of highly-skilled (n = 12), moderately-skilled (n = 12) and lesser-skilled players (n = 8) when responding to a life-size, interactive video display of a netball player initiating a pass was compared to a traditional, pre-planned agility movement where no external stimulus was present. The total movement times and decision times of the players were the primary dependent measures of interest. A second purpose of the research was to determine the test-retest reliability of the testing approach. Results revealed significant differences existed between the 2 test conditions demonstrating that they were measuring different types of agility. The highly-skilled group was significantly faster in both the reactive and planned test conditions relative to the lesser-skilled group, while the moderately-skilled group was significantly faster than the lesser-skilled group in the reactive test condition. The decision time component within the reactive test condition revealed that the highly-skilled players made significantly faster decisions than the lesser-skilled players. It is reasoned that it is this decision-making component of reactive agility that contributes to the significant differences between the two test conditions. The testing approach was shown to have good test-retest reliability with an intra-class correlation of r = .83.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 272 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 19%
Student > Bachelor 46 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 10%
Researcher 21 8%
Student > Postgraduate 14 5%
Other 42 15%
Unknown 73 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 143 51%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 4%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 22 8%
Unknown 77 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
#2,380
of 2,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,896
of 76,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,874 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.