↓ Skip to main content

Engineering Cell Shape and Function

Overview of attention for article published in Science, April 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
patent
76 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1350 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
585 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Engineering Cell Shape and Function
Published in
Science, April 1994
DOI 10.1126/science.8171320
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rahul Singhvi, Amit Kumar, Gabriel P. Lopez, Gregory N. Stephanopoulos, Daniel I. C. Wang, George M. Whitesides, Donald E. Ingber

Abstract

An elastomeric stamp, containing defined features on the micrometer scale, was used to imprint gold surfaces with specific patterns of self-assembled monolayers of alkanethiols and, thereby, to create islands of defined shape and size that support extracellular matrix protein adsorption and cell attachment. Through this technique, it was possible to place cells in predetermined locations and arrays, separated by defined distances, and to dictate their shape. Limiting the degree of cell extension provided control over cell growth and protein secretion. This method is experimentally simple and highly adaptable. It should be useful for applications in biotechnology that require analysis of individual cells cultured at high density or repeated access to cells placed in specified locations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 585 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 18 3%
Germany 5 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
France 3 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 543 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 175 30%
Researcher 92 16%
Student > Master 72 12%
Student > Bachelor 50 9%
Professor 39 7%
Other 86 15%
Unknown 71 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 132 23%
Engineering 120 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 51 9%
Chemistry 47 8%
Materials Science 42 7%
Other 97 17%
Unknown 96 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,481,018
of 25,554,853 outputs
Outputs from Science
#23,893
of 83,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#308
of 21,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#13
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,554,853 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 21,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.