| Title |
Recent advances in ancient DNA research and their implications for archaeobotany
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00334-014-0489-4 |
| Authors |
Terence A. Brown, Enrico Cappellini, Logan Kistler, Diane L. Lister, Hugo R. Oliveira, Nathan Wales, Angela Schlumbaum |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| Japan | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 113 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 30% |
| Researcher | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 30% |
| Arts and Humanities | 20 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2014.
All research outputs
#7,856,604
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Vegetation History and Archaeobotany
#190
of 418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,647
of 256,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vegetation History and Archaeobotany
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.