↓ Skip to main content

Optimal design of measurements on queueing systems

Overview of attention for article published in Queueing Systems, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Optimal design of measurements on queueing systems
Published in
Queueing Systems, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11134-014-9421-y
Authors

Ben M. Parker, Steven Gilmour, John Schormans, Hugo Maruri-Aguilar

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 50%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 50%
Engineering 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2014.
All research outputs
#15,306,972
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from Queueing Systems
#58
of 100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,690
of 254,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Queueing Systems
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them