| Title |
Definition, etiology, prevention and treatment of peri-implantitis – a review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Head & Face Medicine, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-160x-10-34 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ralf Smeets, Anders Henningsen, Ole Jung, Max Heiland, Christian Hammächer, Jamal M Stein |
| Abstract |
Peri-implant inflammations represent serious diseases after dental implant treatment, which affect both the surrounding hard and soft tissue. Due to prevalence rates up to 56%, peri-implantitis can lead to the loss of the implant without multilateral prevention and therapy concepts. Specific continuous check-ups with evaluation and elimination of risk factors (e.g. smoking, systemic diseases and periodontitis) are effective precautions. In addition to aspects of osseointegration, type and structure of the implant surface are of importance. For the treatment of peri-implant disease various conservative and surgical approaches are available. Mucositis and moderate forms of peri-implantitis can obviously be treated effectively using conservative methods. These include the utilization of different manual ablations, laser-supported systems as well as photodynamic therapy, which may be extended by local or systemic antibiotics. It is possible to regain osseointegration. In cases with advanced peri-implantitis surgical therapies are more effective than conservative approaches. Depending on the configuration of the defects, resective surgery can be carried out for elimination of peri-implant lesions, whereas regenerative therapies may be applicable for defect filling. The cumulative interceptive supportive therapy (CIST) protocol serves as guidance for the treatment of the peri-implantitis. The aim of this review is to provide an overview about current data and to give advices regarding diagnosis, prevention and treatment of peri-implant disease for practitioners. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Italy | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 766 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 758 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 115 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 85 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 69 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 63 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 55 | 7% |
| Other | 127 | 17% |
| Unknown | 252 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 365 | 48% |
| Engineering | 22 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 2% |
| Materials Science | 15 | 2% |
| Other | 62 | 8% |
| Unknown | 264 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2022.
All research outputs
#6,493,896
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Head & Face Medicine
#29
of 352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,327
of 252,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Head & Face Medicine
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 352 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.