| Title |
Gene expression differences in primary colorectal tumors and matched liver metastases: chemotherapy related or tumoral heterogeneity?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical and Translational Oncology, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12094-014-1233-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. López-Gómez, J. Moreno-Rubio, I. Suárez-García, P. Cejas, R. Madero, E. Casado, A. M. Jiménez, M. Sereno, C. Gómez-Raposo, F. Zambrana, M. Merino, D. Fernández-Luengas, J. Feliu |
| Abstract |
Treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is generally based on genetic testing performed in primary tumor biopsies, but whether the genomic status of primary tumors is identical to that of metastases is not well known. We compared the gene expression profiles of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) biopsies of colorectal primary tumors and matched liver metastases. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 16% |
| Professor | 3 | 16% |
| Researcher | 3 | 16% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 26% |
| Unknown | 1 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 21% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2014.
All research outputs
#17,728,060
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Oncology
#766
of 1,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,163
of 255,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Oncology
#8
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,294 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.