↓ Skip to main content

Influence of a Large-Eddy-Breakup-Device on the Turbulent Interface of Boundary Layers

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Scientific Research, Section B, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Influence of a Large-Eddy-Breakup-Device on the Turbulent Interface of Boundary Layers
Published in
Applied Scientific Research, Section B, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10494-017-9861-7
Authors

Cheng Chin, Ramis Örlü, Philipp Schlatter, Jason Monty, Nicholas Hutchins

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Lecturer 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 63%
Energy 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2017.
All research outputs
#17,350,971
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Applied Scientific Research, Section B
#167
of 597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,695
of 336,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Scientific Research, Section B
#11
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 597 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.