↓ Skip to main content

Methods of ethics and the descent of man: Darwin and Sidgwick on ethics and evolution

Overview of attention for article published in Biology & Philosophy, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Methods of ethics and the descent of man: Darwin and Sidgwick on ethics and evolution
Published in
Biology & Philosophy, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10539-010-9204-8
Authors

Hallvard Lillehammer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 31 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Lecturer 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 14 42%
Psychology 5 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 12%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 2 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2014.
All research outputs
#18,379,655
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from Biology & Philosophy
#577
of 663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,998
of 94,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology & Philosophy
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.