↓ Skip to main content

Exploring the binding of two potent anticancer drugs bosutinib and imatinib mesylate with bovine serum albumin: spectroscopic and molecular dynamic simulation studies

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Exploring the binding of two potent anticancer drugs bosutinib and imatinib mesylate with bovine serum albumin: spectroscopic and molecular dynamic simulation studies
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00216-017-0565-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suma K. Pawar, Roopa S. Naik, J. Seetharamappa

Abstract

Bosutinib (BST) and imatinib mesylate (IMT) are tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). In view of the importance of these inhibitors in cancer treatment, we investigated the mechanism of interaction between BST/IMT and bovine serum albumin (BSA) using various spectroscopic and molecular docking methods. Fluorescence studies indicated that BST/IMT interacted with BSA without affecting the microenvironment around the residue Trp213 of BSA. The quenching mechanism associated with the BST-BSA and IMT-BSA interactions was determined by performing fluorescence measurements at different temperatures. These results suggested that BST and IMT quenched the fluorescence intensity of BSA through static and dynamic processes, respectively, which was confirmed by time-resolved fluorescence measurements. Evaluation of the thermodynamic parameters ∆H°, ∆S°, and ∆G° suggested that hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions played significant roles in the BST-BSA interaction, while IMT-BSA was stabilized by hydrophobic forces. Competitive experimental results revealed that the primary binding sites for BST and IMT on BSA were sites II and I, respectively. This was supported by the results of molecular docking and dynamic simulation studies. The change in the secondary structure of BSA upon binding with BST/IMT was investigated by 3D fluorescence, absorption, and CD spectroscopic studies. In addition, the influences of β-cyclodextrin and metal ions (Cu(2+) and Zn(2+)) on the binding affinities of BST and IMT to BSA were examined. Graphical abstract Binding of BST and IMT in BSA at site II and site I respectively.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Student > Master 4 18%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 10 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 9 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#7,543
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,296
of 323,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#110
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.