↓ Skip to main content

Methods for large-scale production of AM fungi: past, present, and future

Overview of attention for article published in Mycorrhiza, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
165 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
333 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Methods for large-scale production of AM fungi: past, present, and future
Published in
Mycorrhiza, August 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00572-010-0337-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marleen IJdo, Sylvie Cranenbrouck, Stéphane Declerck

Abstract

Many different cultivation techniques and inoculum products of the plant-beneficial arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi have been developed in the last decades. Soil- and substrate-based production techniques as well as substrate-free culture techniques (hydroponics and aeroponics) and in vitro cultivation methods have all been attempted for the large-scale production of AM fungi. In this review, we describe the principal in vivo and in vitro production methods that have been developed so far. We present the parameters that are critical for optimal production, discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the methods, and highlight their most probable sectors of application.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 320 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 16%
Researcher 52 16%
Student > Master 41 12%
Student > Bachelor 40 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 7%
Other 57 17%
Unknown 66 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 177 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 6%
Environmental Science 20 6%
Engineering 11 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 2%
Other 17 5%
Unknown 81 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2015.
All research outputs
#7,202,561
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from Mycorrhiza
#158
of 647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,938
of 94,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mycorrhiza
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 647 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.