↓ Skip to main content

A threatened world city: the benefits of protecting London from the sea

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
A threatened world city: the benefits of protecting London from the sea
Published in
Natural Hazards, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-0075-3
Authors

Edmund C. Penning-Rowsell, Nick Haigh, Sarah Lavery, Loraine McFadden

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Other 3 5%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 13 22%
Environmental Science 10 17%
Social Sciences 6 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 10%
Arts and Humanities 4 7%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 14 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,440,289
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#101
of 1,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,169
of 170,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#3
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.