| Title |
Randomised controlled trial of pelvic floor muscle exercises and manometric biofeedback for erectile dysfunction.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, November 2004
|
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Grace Dorey, Mark Speakman, Roger Feneley, Annette Swinkels, Christopher Dunn, Paul Ewings |
| Abstract |
The pelvic floor muscles are active in normal erectile function. Therefore, it was hypothesised that weak pelvic floor muscles could be a cause of erectile dysfunction. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 30% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 18% |
| Unknown | 39 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 16% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 43 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 125. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#339,101
of 25,701,027 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#127
of 4,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#346
of 75,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,701,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.