↓ Skip to main content

Comparing plant and animal extracellular matrix-cytoskeleton connections ? are they alike?

Overview of attention for article published in Protoplasma, September 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Comparing plant and animal extracellular matrix-cytoskeleton connections ? are they alike?
Published in
Protoplasma, September 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf01281321
Authors

C. Reuzeau, R. F. Pont-Lezica

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 24%
Student > Master 3 18%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Professor 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 12%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Unknown 3 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,541,115
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Protoplasma
#135
of 980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,097
of 24,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Protoplasma
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 980 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 24,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.