↓ Skip to main content

Probing the Biophysical Properties of Primary Breast Tumor-Derived Fibroblasts

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Probing the Biophysical Properties of Primary Breast Tumor-Derived Fibroblasts
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12195-014-0360-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Turi A. Alcoser, Francois Bordeleau, Shawn P. Carey, Marsha C. Lampi, Daniel R. Kowal, Sahana Somasegar, Sonal Varma, Sandra J. Shin, Cynthia A. Reinhart-King

Abstract

As cancer progresses, cells must adapt to a new and stiffer environment, which can ultimately alter how normal cells within the tumor behave. In turn, these cells are known to further aid tumor progression. Therefore, there is potentially a unique avenue to better understand metastatic potential through single-cell biophysical assays performed on patient-derived cells. Here, we perform biophysical characterization of primary human fibroblastic cells obtained from mammary carcinoma and normal contralateral tissue. Through a series of tissue dissociation, differential centrifugation and trypsinization steps, we isolate an adherent fibroblastic population viable for biomechanical testing. 2D TFM and 3D migration measurements in a collagen matrix show that fibroblasts obtained from patient tumors generate more traction forces and display improved migration potential than their counterparts from normal tissue. Moreover, through the use of an embedded spheroid model, we confirmed the extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling behavior of primary cells isolated from carcinoma. Overall, correlating biophysical characterization of normal- and carcinoma-derived samples from individual patient along with patient outcome may become a powerful approach to further our comprehension of metastasis and ultimately design drug targets on a patient-specific basis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 28%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 13 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 21%
Engineering 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Unspecified 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 15 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2015.
All research outputs
#13,920,619
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
#229
of 457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,009
of 254,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 457 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.