You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Mobile Application for Monitoring and Management of Depressed Mood in a Vulnerable Pregnant Population
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychiatric Services, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1176/appi.ps.201600582 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Liisa Hantsoo, Stephanie Criniti, Annum Khan, Marian Moseley, Naomi Kincler, Laura J Faherty, C Neill Epperson, Ian M Bennett |
| Abstract |
This study tested whether a mood tracking and alert (MTA) mobile application (app) improved mental health care delivery in a high-risk obstetric population. Pregnant women with depressive symptomatology at <32 weeks gestation were followed for eight weeks after randomization to a control patient portal (PP) app alone or with the MTA app. The MTA app monitored activity, assessed mood, and alerted obstetric providers of signs of worsening mood. Seventy-two women enrolled (PP, N=24; MTA, N=48). MTA users had significantly more contacts addressing mental health, and as gestational age increased, they rated ability to manage their own health significantly better than women in the control group. Women who received telephone contact from a provider triggered by an MTA app alert were significantly more likely to receive a mental health specialist referral. A mobile MTA app improved service delivery and patient engagement among patients with perinatal depression symptoms. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 276 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 46 | 17% |
| Unknown | 101 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 17% |
| Psychology | 40 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 10% |
| Unknown | 115 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2017.
All research outputs
#6,600,606
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Psychiatric Services
#2,001
of 4,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,181
of 335,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychiatric Services
#29
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.