↓ Skip to main content

Impaired chemosensory control of breathing after depletion of bulbospinal catecholaminergic neurons in rats

Overview of attention for article published in Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Impaired chemosensory control of breathing after depletion of bulbospinal catecholaminergic neurons in rats
Published in
Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00424-017-2078-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Milene R. Malheiros-Lima, Leonardo T. Totola, Ana C. Takakura, Thiago S. Moreira

Abstract

Bulbospinal catecholaminergic neurons located in the rostral aspect of the ventrolateral medulla (C1 neurons) or within the ventrolateral pons (A5 neurons) are involved in the regulation of blood pressure and sympathetic outflow. A stimulus that commonly activates the C1 or A5 neurons is hypoxia, which is also involved in breathing activation. Although pharmacological and optogenetic evidence suggests that catecholaminergic neurons also regulate breathing, a specific contribution of the bulbospinal neurons to respiratory control has not been demonstrated. Therefore, in the present study, we evaluated whether the loss of bulbospinal catecholaminergic C1 and A5 cells affects cardiorespiratory control during resting, hypoxic (8% O2), and hypercapnic (7% CO2) conditions in unanesthetized rats. Thoracic spinal cord (T4-T8) injections of the immunotoxin anti-dopamine β-hydroxylase-saporin (anti-DβH-SAP-2.4 ng/100 nl) and the retrograde tracer Fluor-Gold or ventrolateral pontine injections of 6-OHDA were performed in adult male Wistar rats (250-280 g, N = 7-9/group). Anti-DβH-SAP or 6-OHDA eliminated most bulbospinal C1 and A5 neurons or A5 neurons, respectively. Serotonergic neurons and astrocytes were spared. Depletion of the bulbospinal catecholaminergic cells did not change cardiorespiratory variables under resting condition, but it did affect the response to hypoxia and hypercapnia. Specifically, the increase in the ventilation, the number of sighs, and the tachycardia were reduced, but the MAP increased during hypoxia in anti-DβH-SAP-treated rats. Our data reveal that the bulbospinal catecholaminergic neurons (A5 and C1) facilitate the ventilatory reflex to hypoxia and hypercapnia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 16%
Researcher 3 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 6 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 5 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 16%
Computer Science 2 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 6 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2017.
All research outputs
#21,164,509
of 23,818,521 outputs
Outputs from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#1,798
of 1,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,796
of 327,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
#14
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,818,521 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,973 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.