↓ Skip to main content

Pioglitazone reduces cold-induced brown fat glucose uptake despite induction of browning in cultured human adipocytes: a randomised, controlled trial in humans

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
33 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Pioglitazone reduces cold-induced brown fat glucose uptake despite induction of browning in cultured human adipocytes: a randomised, controlled trial in humans
Published in
Diabetologia, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00125-017-4479-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca K. C. Loh, Melissa F. Formosa, Nina Eikelis, David A. Bertovic, Mitchell J. Anderson, Shane A. Barwood, Shane Nanayakkara, Neale D. Cohen, Andre La Gerche, Anne T. Reutens, Kenneth S. Yap, Thomas W. Barber, Gavin W. Lambert, Martin H. Cherk, Stephen J. Duffy, Bronwyn A. Kingwell, Andrew L. Carey

Abstract

Increasing brown adipose tissue (BAT) activity is a possible therapeutic strategy to increase energy expenditure and glucose and lipid clearance to ameliorate obesity and associated comorbidities. The thiazolidinedione (TZD) class of glucose-lowering drugs increase BAT browning in preclinical experimental models but whether these actions extend to humans in vivo is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of pioglitazone treatment on adipocyte browning and adaptive thermogenesis in humans. We first examined whether pioglitazone treatment of cultured human primary subacromioclavicular-derived adipocytes induced browning. Then, in a blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel trial, conducted within the Baker Institute clinical research laboratories, 14 lean male participants who were free of cardiometabolic disease were randomised to receive either placebo (lactose; n = 7, age 22 ± 1 years) or pioglitazone (45 mg/day, n = 7, age 21 ± 1 years) for 28 days. Participants were allocated to treatments by Alfred Hospital staff independent from the study via electronic generation of a random number sequence. Researchers conducting trials and analysing data were blind to treatment allocation. The change in cold-stimulated BAT activity, assessed before and after the intervention by [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake via positron emission tomography/computed tomography in upper thoracic and cervical adipose tissue, was the primary outcome measure. Energy expenditure, cardiovascular responses, core temperature, blood metabolites and hormones were measured in response to acute cold exposure along with body composition before and after the intervention. Pioglitazone significantly increased in vitro browning and adipogenesis of adipocytes. In the clinical trial, cold-induced BAT maximum standardised uptake value was significantly reduced after pioglitazone compared with placebo (-57 ± 6% vs -12 ± 18%, respectively; p < 0.05). BAT total glucose uptake followed a similar but non-significant trend (-50 ± 10% vs -6 ± 24%, respectively; p = 0.097). Pioglitazone increased total and lean body mass compared with placebo (p < 0.05). No other changes between groups were detected. The disparity in the actions of pioglitazone on BAT between preclinical experimental models and our in vivo human trial highlight the imperative to conduct human proof-of-concept studies as early as possible in BAT research programmes aimed at therapeutic development. Our clinical trial findings suggest that reduced BAT activity may contribute to weight gain associated with pioglitazone and other TZDs. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02236962 FUNDING: This work was supported by the Diabetes Australia Research Program and OIS scheme from the Victorian State Government.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 19 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Sports and Recreations 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 29 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2018.
All research outputs
#796,086
of 23,302,246 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#438
of 5,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,185
of 327,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#18
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,302,246 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.