You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Towards evidence-based hand exercises in rheumatoid arthritis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61285-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christina H Opava, Mathilda Björk |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 26% |
| Spain | 3 | 7% |
| Canada | 3 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Kenya | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Thailand | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 72% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 15% |
| Scientists | 5 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 46 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 19% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 21% |
| Unknown | 10 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2015.
All research outputs
#882,998
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#7,046
of 42,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,450
of 267,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#150
of 569 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 569 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.