Title |
Nanotechnology and the public: Effectively communicating nanoscale science and engineering concepts
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Nanoparticle Research, September 2006
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11051-006-9160-z |
Authors |
O. M. Castellini, G. K. Walejko, C. E. Holladay, T. J. Theim, G. M. Zenner, W. C. Crone |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 6% |
Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 82 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 23% |
Researcher | 16 | 18% |
Professor | 12 | 14% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 10% |
Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
Other | 10 | 11% |
Unknown | 13 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 18 | 20% |
Chemistry | 12 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 13% |
Engineering | 9 | 10% |
Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
Other | 17 | 19% |
Unknown | 17 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2015.
All research outputs
#4,406,002
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#96
of 1,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,115
of 90,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,040 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.