| Title |
Clinical applications of indocyanine green (ICG) enhanced fluorescence in laparoscopic surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-014-3895-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luigi Boni, Giulia David, Alberto Mangano, Gianlorenzo Dionigi, Stefano Rausei, Sebastiano Spampatti, Elisa Cassinotti, Abe Fingerhut |
| Abstract |
Recently major developments in video imaging have been achieved: among these, the use of high definition and 3D imaging systems, and more recently indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging are emerging as major contributions to intraoperative decision making during surgical procedures. The aim of this study was to present our experience with different laparoscopic procedures using ICG fluorescence imaging. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 20% |
| Turkey | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 371 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 364 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 13% |
| Researcher | 37 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 9% |
| Other | 34 | 9% |
| Other | 83 | 22% |
| Unknown | 98 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 159 | 43% |
| Engineering | 15 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 47 | 13% |
| Unknown | 119 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,221,802
of 25,654,566 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#74
of 6,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,267
of 269,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#1
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,930 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.