You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Long‐term follow‐up in optimally treated and stable heart failure patients: primary care vs. heart failure clinic. Results of the COACH‐2 study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Heart Failure, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ejhf.173 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marie Louise A. Luttik, Tiny Jaarsma, Peter Paul van Geel, Maaike Brons, Hans L. Hillege, Arno W. Hoes, Richard de Jong, Gerard Linssen, Dirk J.A. Lok, Marjolein Berge, Dirk J. van Veldhuisen |
| Abstract |
It has been suggested that home-based heart failure (HF) management in primary care may be an alternative to clinic-based management in HF patients. However, little is known about adherence to HF guidelines and adherence to the medication regimen in these home-based programmes. The aim of the current study was to determine whether long-term follow-up and treatment in primary care is equally effective as follow-up at a specialized HF clinic in terms of guideline adherence and patient adherence, in HF patients initially managed and up-titrated to optimal treatment at a specialized HF clinic. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 131 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 15% |
| Researcher | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Unknown | 32 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 35 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2018.
All research outputs
#8,203,257
of 24,577,646 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Heart Failure
#1,361
of 2,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,346
of 261,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Heart Failure
#8
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,577,646 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,428 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.