Title |
Laboratory and home comparison of wrist-activity monitors and polysomnography in middle-aged adults
|
---|---|
Published in |
Sleep and Biological Rhythms, October 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/s41105-017-0130-x |
Authors |
Ian C. Dunican, Kevin Murray, James A. Slater, Kathleen J. Maddison, Maddison J. Jones, Brian Dawson, Leon M. Straker, John A. Caldwell, Shona L. Halson, Peter R. Eastwood |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 23% |
Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
Unspecified | 3 | 8% |
Other | 7 | 18% |
Unknown | 9 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 5 | 13% |
Sports and Recreations | 5 | 13% |
Unspecified | 3 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
Other | 10 | 25% |
Unknown | 11 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2022.
All research outputs
#4,342,691
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Sleep and Biological Rhythms
#53
of 244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,981
of 329,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sleep and Biological Rhythms
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 244 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.