| Title |
The use of wild relatives in crop improvement: a survey of developments over the last 20 years
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Euphytica, February 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10681-007-9363-0 |
| Authors |
Reem Hajjar, Toby Hodgkin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Georgia | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 684 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 1% |
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 1% |
| Unknown | 655 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 153 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 147 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 84 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 39 | 6% |
| Other | 90 | 13% |
| Unknown | 130 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 441 | 64% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 43 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 24 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 1% |
| Chemistry | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 20 | 3% |
| Unknown | 145 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,309,288
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Euphytica
#15
of 1,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,538
of 172,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Euphytica
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,245 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them