You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Stereoselective Epimerizations of Glycosyl Thiols
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Organic Letters, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b02760 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lisa M. Doyle, Shane O’Sullivan, Claudia Di Salvo, Michelle McKinney, Patrick McArdle, Paul V. Murphy |
| Abstract |
Glycosyl thiols are widely used in stereoselective S-glycoside synthesis. Their epimerization from 1,2-trans to 1,2-cis thiols (e.g., equatorial to axial epimerization in thioglucopyranose) was attained using TiCl4, while SnCl4 promoted their axial-to-equatorial epimerization. The method included application for stereoselective β-d-manno- and β-l-rhamnopyranosyl thiol formation. Complex formation explains the equatorial preference when using SnCl4, whereas TiCl4 can shift the equilibrium toward the 1,2-cis thiol via 1,3-oxathiolane formation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 75% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 48 | 72% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 12 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2017.
All research outputs
#13,334,654
of 23,486,774 outputs
Outputs from Organic Letters
#9,536
of 14,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,135
of 327,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Organic Letters
#78
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,486,774 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,362 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.