You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comprehensive Analysis of Hypermutation in Human Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.048 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brittany B. Campbell, Nicholas Light, David Fabrizio, Matthew Zatzman, Fabio Fuligni, Richard de Borja, Scott Davidson, Melissa Edwards, Julia A. Elvin, Karl P. Hodel, Walter J. Zahurancik, Zucai Suo, Tatiana Lipman, Katharina Wimmer, Christian P. Kratz, Daniel C. Bowers, Theodore W. Laetsch, Gavin P. Dunn, Tanner M. Johanns, Matthew R. Grimmer, Ivan V. Smirnov, Valérie Larouche, David Samuel, Annika Bronsema, Michael Osborn, Duncan Stearns, Pichai Raman, Kristina A. Cole, Phillip B. Storm, Michal Yalon, Enrico Opocher, Gary Mason, Gregory A. Thomas, Magnus Sabel, Ben George, David S. Ziegler, Scott Lindhorst, Vanan Magimairajan Issai, Shlomi Constantini, Helen Toledano, Ronit Elhasid, Roula Farah, Rina Dvir, Peter Dirks, Annie Huang, Melissa A. Galati, Jiil Chung, Vijay Ramaswamy, Meredith S. Irwin, Melyssa Aronson, Carol Durno, Michael D. Taylor, Gideon Rechavi, John M. Maris, Eric Bouffet, Cynthia Hawkins, Joseph F. Costello, M. Stephen Meyn, Zachary F. Pursell, David Malkin, Uri Tabori, Adam Shlien |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 295 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 89 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 5% |
| Australia | 11 | 4% |
| Canada | 10 | 3% |
| Spain | 9 | 3% |
| France | 9 | 3% |
| Japan | 5 | 2% |
| Germany | 4 | 1% |
| India | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 46 | 16% |
| Unknown | 93 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 148 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 130 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 794 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 794 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 194 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 147 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 67 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 48 | 6% |
| Other | 124 | 16% |
| Unknown | 165 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 244 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 140 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 127 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 27 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 17 | 2% |
| Other | 58 | 7% |
| Unknown | 181 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 186. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#218,949
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#1,202
of 17,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,430
of 337,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#22
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.