↓ Skip to main content

Is climate change controversy good for science? IPCC and contrarian reports in the light of bibliometrics

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Is climate change controversy good for science? IPCC and contrarian reports in the light of bibliometrics
Published in
Scientometrics, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11192-017-2440-9
Authors

Ferenc Jankó, Judit Papp Vancsó, Norbert Móricz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Environmental Science 4 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 10%
Computer Science 3 7%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 12 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,541,115
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#1,318
of 2,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,740
of 316,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#28
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.