You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Lancet Commission on pollution and health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32345-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philip J Landrigan, Richard Fuller, Nereus J R Acosta, Olusoji Adeyi, Robert Arnold, Niladri Basu, Abdoulaye Bibi Baldé, Roberto Bertollini, Stephan Bose-O'Reilly, Jo Ivey Boufford, Patrick N Breysse, Thomas Chiles, Chulabhorn Mahidol, Awa M Coll-Seck, Maureen L Cropper, Julius Fobil, Valentin Fuster, Michael Greenstone, Andy Haines, David Hanrahan, David Hunter, Mukesh Khare, Alan Krupnick, Bruce Lanphear, Bindu Lohani, Keith Martin, Karen V Mathiasen, Maureen A McTeer, Christopher J L Murray, Johanita D Ndahimananjara, Frederica Perera, Janez Potočnik, Alexander S Preker, Jairam Ramesh, Johan Rockström, Carlos Salinas, Leona D Samson, Karti Sandilya, Peter D Sly, Kirk R Smith, Achim Steiner, Richard B Stewart, William A Suk, Onno C P van Schayck, Gautam N Yadama, Kandeh Yumkella, Ma Zhong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,535 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 209 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 114 | 7% |
| Spain | 96 | 6% |
| India | 72 | 5% |
| Canada | 65 | 4% |
| Australia | 33 | 2% |
| France | 28 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 19 | 1% |
| Mexico | 18 | 1% |
| Other | 281 | 18% |
| Unknown | 600 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1134 | 74% |
| Scientists | 218 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 130 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 53 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,909 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3909 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 512 | 13% |
| Researcher | 504 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 490 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 368 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 207 | 5% |
| Other | 606 | 16% |
| Unknown | 1222 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 490 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 325 | 8% |
| Engineering | 219 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 185 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 175 | 4% |
| Other | 1020 | 26% |
| Unknown | 1495 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3409. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,736
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#107
of 42,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17
of 337,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#3
of 416 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,983 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 416 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.