↓ Skip to main content

Amounts Spent on Engagement Rings Reflect Aspects of Male and Female Mate Quality

Overview of attention for article published in Human Nature, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
22 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Amounts Spent on Engagement Rings Reflect Aspects of Male and Female Mate Quality
Published in
Human Nature, September 2007
DOI 10.1007/s12110-007-9018-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lee Cronk, Bria Dunham

Abstract

Previous research has shown that the qualities of nuptial gifts among nonhumans and marriage-related property transfers in human societies such as bridewealth and dowry covary with aspects of mate quality. This article explores this issue for another type of marriage-related property transfer: engagement rings. We obtained data on engagement ring costs and other variables through a mail survey sent to recently married individuals living in the American Midwest. This article focuses on survey responses regarding rings that were purchased by men acting alone and using only their own funds who then presented the rings while making surprise proposals of marriage (n = 127). Men marrying younger women spent more on rings, as did men who earned more money and whose fiancées earned more money. These findings suggest that the amounts spent on engagement rings, like bridewealth and dowry payments in other societies, reflect aspects of both male and female mate quality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 6%
United States 2 4%
Unknown 45 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 24%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 24%
Social Sciences 11 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 18%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 8%
Design 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 8 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#636,445
of 25,530,891 outputs
Outputs from Human Nature
#64
of 547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#960
of 84,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Nature
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,530,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 547 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.