↓ Skip to main content

Extraction and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from post-consumer wood fiberboard waste

Overview of attention for article published in Cellulose, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Extraction and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from post-consumer wood fiberboard waste
Published in
Cellulose, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10570-017-1252-7
Authors

Laetitia Couret, Mark Irle, Christophe Belloncle, Bernard Cathala

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 4 5%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 27 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 11 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 10%
Engineering 9 10%
Materials Science 7 8%
Chemical Engineering 6 7%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 32 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2017.
All research outputs
#15,481,888
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Cellulose
#713
of 912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,712
of 308,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellulose
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 912 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.