Title |
Extraction and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from post-consumer wood fiberboard waste
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cellulose, March 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10570-017-1252-7 |
Authors |
Laetitia Couret, Mark Irle, Christophe Belloncle, Bernard Cathala |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 15% |
Researcher | 11 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
Other | 18 | 20% |
Unknown | 27 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 11 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 10% |
Engineering | 9 | 10% |
Materials Science | 7 | 8% |
Chemical Engineering | 6 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 16% |
Unknown | 32 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2017.
All research outputs
#15,481,888
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Cellulose
#713
of 912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,712
of 308,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellulose
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 912 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.