↓ Skip to main content

Voluntary stopping of eating and drinking: is medical support ethically justified?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Voluntary stopping of eating and drinking: is medical support ethically justified?
Published in
BMC Medicine, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12916-017-0950-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ralf J. Jox, Isra Black, Gian Domenico Borasio, Johanna Anneser

Abstract

Physician-assisted dying has been the subject of extensive discussion and legislative activity both in Europe and North America. In this context, dying by voluntary stopping of eating and drinking (VSED) is often proposed, and practiced, as an alternative method of self-determined dying, with medical support for VSED being regarded as ethically and legally justified. In our opinion, this view is flawed. First, we argue that VSED falls within the concept of suicide, albeit with certain unique features (non-invasiveness, initial reversibility, resemblance to the natural dying process). Second, we demonstrate, on the basis of paradigmatic clinical cases, that medically supported VSED is, at least in some instances, tantamount to assisted suicide. This is especially the case if a patient's choice of VSED depends on the physician's assurance to provide medical support. Thus, for many jurisdictions worldwide, medically supported VSED may fall within the legal prohibitions on suicide assistance. Physicians, lawmakers, and societies should discuss specific ways of regulating medical support for VSED in order to provide clear guidance for both patients and healthcare professionals. Please see related article: http://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-017-0951-0 .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 18%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Unspecified 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 13 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 13 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 14%
Psychology 7 13%
Unspecified 5 9%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 17 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2023.
All research outputs
#738,013
of 24,285,692 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#519
of 3,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,175
of 332,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#7
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,285,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.