↓ Skip to main content

Localization of helotialean fungi on ectomycorrhizae of Castanopsis cuspidata visualized by in situ hybridization

Overview of attention for article published in Mycorrhiza, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Localization of helotialean fungi on ectomycorrhizae of Castanopsis cuspidata visualized by in situ hybridization
Published in
Mycorrhiza, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00572-017-0803-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Noritaka Nakamura, Eiji Tanaka, Chihiro Tanaka, Yuko Takeuchi-Kaneko

Abstract

Non-ectomycorrhizal fungi that associate with typical ectomycorrhizae often remain hidden, and their localization inside ectomycorrhizal (ECM) roots has remained uncharacterized. In this study, the fungal community associated with the ectomycorrhizae of Castanopsis cuspidata was investigated using a culture-dependent isolation technique. Additionally, the species composition and localization were determined using molecular techniques. The results of the isolation and identification of fungal species revealed the predominance of a few species belonging to the order Helotiales. Furthermore, the fungal community structures were significantly different depending on the taxa of the ectomycorrhiza-forming fungi. A taxon-specific probe was developed to analyze the localization of one dominant Hyaloscyphaceae (Helotiales) species in ECM tissues by in situ hybridization. Hybridization signals were detected on the surface of the fungal mantle and around the ECM fungal cells within the mantle. Hyphal penetration into ECM hyphal cells of fungal mantles was also observed. Signals were not detected in the Hartig net or plant tissues inside the mantle in healthy ectomycorrhizae. These findings suggest that the analyzed species interact not only with host plant as root endophyte but also directly with the ECM fungi.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 22%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Other 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 6 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 44%
Environmental Science 4 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Unknown 9 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2018.
All research outputs
#14,957,541
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Mycorrhiza
#359
of 655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,587
of 327,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mycorrhiza
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 655 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.