↓ Skip to main content

A profound computational study to prioritize the disease-causing mutations in PRPS1 gene

Overview of attention for article published in Metabolic Brain Disease, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
A profound computational study to prioritize the disease-causing mutations in PRPS1 gene
Published in
Metabolic Brain Disease, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11011-017-0121-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashish Kumar Agrahari, P. Sneha, C. George Priya Doss, R. Siva, Hatem Zayed

Abstract

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) is one of the most commonly inherited congenital neurological disorders, affecting approximately 1 in 2500 in the US. About 80 genes were found to be in association with CMT. The phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate synthetase 1 (PRPS1) is an essential enzyme in the primary stage of de novo and salvage nucleotide synthesis. The mutations in the PRPS1 gene leads to X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy type 5 (CMTX5), PRS super activity, Arts syndrome, X-linked deafness-1, breast cancer, and colorectal cancer. In the present study, we obtained 20 missense mutations from UniProt and dbSNP databases and applied series of comprehensive in silico prediction methods to assess the degree of pathogenicity and stability. In silico tools predicted four missense mutations (D52H, M115 T, L152P, and D203H) to be potential disease causing mutations. We further subjected the four mutations along with native protein to 50 ns molecular dynamics simulation (MDS) using Gromacs package. The resulting trajectory files were analyzed to understand the stability differences caused by the mutations. We used the Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD), Radius of Gyration (Rg), solvent accessibility surface area (SASA), Covariance matrix, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Free Energy Landscape (FEL), and secondary structure analysis to assess the structural changes in the protein upon mutation. Our study suggests that the four mutations might affect the PRPS1 protein function and stability of the structure. The proposed study may serve as a platform for drug repositioning and personalized medicine for diseases that are caused by the PRPS1 deficiency.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Professor 4 7%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 18 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 19%
Chemistry 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 20 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2017.
All research outputs
#20,450,513
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Metabolic Brain Disease
#842
of 1,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,186
of 327,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metabolic Brain Disease
#18
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,061 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.