You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
T cells expressing CD19 chimeric antigen receptors for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in children and young adults: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61403-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel W Lee, James N Kochenderfer, Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson, Yongzhi K Cui, Cindy Delbrook, Steven A Feldman, Terry J Fry, Rimas Orentas, Marianna Sabatino, Nirali N Shah, Seth M Steinberg, Dave Stroncek, Nick Tschernia, Constance Yuan, Hua Zhang, Ling Zhang, Steven A Rosenberg, Alan S Wayne, Crystal L Mackall |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 10% |
| Spain | 5 | 8% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Russia | 2 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 19 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 70% |
| Scientists | 8 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,611 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1582 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 274 | 17% |
| Researcher | 240 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 207 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 163 | 10% |
| Other | 95 | 6% |
| Other | 246 | 15% |
| Unknown | 386 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 347 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 274 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 191 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 168 | 10% |
| Engineering | 54 | 3% |
| Other | 150 | 9% |
| Unknown | 427 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 175. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2024.
All research outputs
#234,763
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#2,650
of 43,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,148
of 270,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#36
of 567 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 567 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.