↓ Skip to main content

Vehicle automation and freeway ‘pipeline’ capacity in the context of legal standards of care

Overview of attention for article published in Transportation, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Vehicle automation and freeway ‘pipeline’ capacity in the context of legal standards of care
Published in
Transportation, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11116-017-9825-8
Authors

Scott Le Vine, You Kong, Xiaobo Liu, John Polak

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 20%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 11 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 19 43%
Computer Science 4 9%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Psychology 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 14 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2018.
All research outputs
#13,542,652
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Transportation
#401
of 567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,687
of 329,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transportation
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 567 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.