You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Chimeric antigen receptor T cells for ALL
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Lancet, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61729-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Persis J Amrolia, Martin Pule |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 2 | 10% |
India | 1 | 5% |
Kenya | 1 | 5% |
Mexico | 1 | 5% |
Spain | 1 | 5% |
Colombia | 1 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
United States | 1 | 5% |
Argentina | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 10 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 70% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 20% |
Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | 1% |
Turkey | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Belgium | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 73 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 21% |
Researcher | 14 | 18% |
Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 14% |
Unknown | 15 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 27% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 22% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 14% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 12% |
Unknown | 14 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,600,165
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#10,882
of 42,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,829
of 268,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#235
of 567 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 567 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.