↓ Skip to main content

Dopamine receptor subtypes in the native human heart

Overview of attention for article published in Heart and Vessels, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Dopamine receptor subtypes in the native human heart
Published in
Heart and Vessels, July 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00380-009-1224-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlo Cavallotti, Massimo Mancone, Paolo Bruzzone, Maurizio Sabbatini, Fiorenzo Mignini

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 53 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 20%
Student > Bachelor 9 17%
Researcher 9 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 10 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Chemistry 5 9%
Neuroscience 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 10 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,855,444
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Heart and Vessels
#115
of 693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,490
of 95,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart and Vessels
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 693 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them