↓ Skip to main content

Spatiotemporal patterns of childhood asthma hospitalization and utilization in Memphis Metropolitan Area from 2005 to 2015

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Asthma, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spatiotemporal patterns of childhood asthma hospitalization and utilization in Memphis Metropolitan Area from 2005 to 2015
Published in
Journal of Asthma, February 2017
DOI 10.1080/02770903.2016.1277537
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tonny J. Oyana, Pradeep Podila, Jagila Minso Wesley, Slawo Lomnicki, Stephania Cormier

Abstract

To identify key risk factors and explain spatiotemporal patterns of childhood asthma in the Memphis Metropolitan Area (MMA) over an 11-year period (2005 to 2015). We hypothesize that in the MMA region this burden is more prevalent among urban children living south, downtown, and north of Memphis than other areas. We used a large-scale longitudinal electronic health record database from an integrated healthcare system, GIS, statistical, and space-time models to study spatiotemporal distributions of childhood asthma at census-tract level. We found statistically significant spatiotemporal clusters of childhood asthma in the south, west, and north of Memphis city after adjusting for key covariates. Results further show a significant increase in temporal gradient in frequency of emergency department visits and inpatient hospitalizations from 2009 to 2013; and an upward trajectory from 4 per 1,000 children in 2005 to 16 per 1,000 children in 2015. The multivariate logistic regression identified age, race, insurance, admit source, encounter type, and frequency of visits as significant risk factors for childhood asthma (p<0.05). We observed a greater asthma burden and healthcare utilization for African American (AA) patients living in a high-risk area than those living in a low-risk area in comparison to the White patients: AA vs. White [Odds Ratio (OR) = 3.03, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 2.75-3.34]; and Hispanic vs. White (OR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.21-2.17). These findings provide a strong basis for developing geographically-tailored population health strategies at the neighborhood level for young children with chronic respiratory conditions.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 18%
Other 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Master 4 7%
Professor 4 7%
Other 16 29%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 39%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 16 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2017.
All research outputs
#20,450,513
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Asthma
#1,796
of 2,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#358,162
of 422,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Asthma
#29
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,049 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.