You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
温水洗浄便座のノズルで穿孔し経肛門的小腸脱出をきたした直腸脱の1例
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association), January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3919/jjsa.78.548 |
| Authors |
Yuya AGATUSMA, Nobuhiko NAKAGAWA, Bin SATO, Akiharu ISHIYAMA, Toshiaki MORI, Kazuki YOKOI |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 27 | 33% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 53 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 80 | 99% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2017.
All research outputs
#727,592
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association)
#1
of 178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,026
of 423,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association)
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 178 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them