You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of Radiotherapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: 20 Years Follow-Up in the Randomized SweDCIS Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Oncology, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1200/jco.2014.56.2595 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fredrik Wärnberg, Hans Garmo, Stefan Emdin, Veronica Hedberg, Linda Adwall, Kerstin Sandelin, Anita Ringberg, Per Karlsson, Lars-Gunnar Arnesson, Harald Anderson, Karin Jirström, Lars Holmberg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 23% |
| Spain | 2 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
| India | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 180 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 18% |
| Other | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 41 | 22% |
| Unknown | 35 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 98 | 53% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 46 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,669,135
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#4,072
of 22,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,680
of 268,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#63
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.